Action to enjoin manufacturer of principal types of machines used in major processes of shoemaking from monopolizing or attempting to monopolize trade or commerce. The United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, 110 F.Supp. 295, entered an order enjoining defendant, and defendant appealed. The United States Supreme Court held that evidence supported determination that defendant, through its practice of distributing the more important types of machines only through leases, and other practices, had acquired such power as to give it effective control of the shoe machinery market in violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, s 2 as amended 15 U.S.C.A. s 2.

PER CURIAM.

The case having been fully argued and the Court being satisfied that the findings are justified by the evidence and support the decree, the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice JACKSON and Mr. Justice CLARK did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

U.S. 1954.

UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORP. v. UNITED STATES

347 U.S. 521, 74 S.Ct. 699, 98 L.Ed. 910